ABSTRACT
Background: We examined the seasonality of wounds and wound infections, including occurrence of multidrug resistance, among combat casualties injured in Afghanistan. Methods: The Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study is a retrospective observational study of infectious complications among military personnel wounded during deployment (06/09-12/14). Wound cultures obtained ≤7 days following injury in Afghanistan were assessed. Epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiologic data were analyzed by injury season [winter (1 Dec-28/29 Feb), spring (1 Mar-31 May), summer (1 Jun-31 Aug), and fall (1 Sep-30 Nov)]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) determinations for Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms were per standardized definitions. Results: The study population included 316 patients with a median of 3.5 (IQR 3-5) days from injury to initial culture. Gram-negatives (N=188, 59.5%) were more commonly isolated from wound cultures in summer (N=81, 43.1%) and fall (N=57, 30.3%) versus winter (N=18, 9.6%) and spring (N=32, 17%) (p< 0.001). The MDR Gram-negatives (N=69, 21.8%) were more common in summer (N=26, 37.7%), and fall (N=26, 37.7%) versus winter (N=3, 4.3%) and spring (N=14, 20.3%) (p=0.028). Wound infections were diagnosed in 198 (63%) patients. The pattern for infecting Gram-negative isolates (N=143, 72.2%, Table 1) was similar to that of overall Gram-negative isolates: summer (79.5%) and fall (83.6%;p< 0.001);MDR Gram-negatives (summer, 25.6%) and (fall, 41.8%;p=0.015). Escherichia coli and Enterobacter spp. were the most common infecting Gram-negative bacilli with no significant difference across the seasons. There was a higher proportion of infecting Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in the summer and fall compared to winter and spring. Infecting Gram-positive isolates (N=128, 65%) were not significantly different by season. Anaerobes associated with infections were also identified (N=30, 15%) with a higher proportion in the winter compared to summer, fall, and spring (p=0.036). Conclusion: Gram-negatives, including MDR Gram-negative infecting organisms, were more common in summer/fall months in service members injured in Afghanistan. This may have implications for empiric antibiotic coverage during these months. Disclosures: David R. Tribble, DrPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response.
ABSTRACT
Background. In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, an emergency use authorization (EUA) was issued for neutralizing antibody therapies including BAM. Licensing trials suggest that use of BAM reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo (1.6% vs 6.3%). However, the real world impact of BAM is not well-described. In this study, risk factors, outcomes, and hospitalization rates among high-risk outpatients presenting with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received BAM were examined. Methods. This is a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who received BAM monotherapy between 11/11/2020 and 3/16/2021. Electronic health records were reviewed for baseline demographics, EUA indications, comorbidities, and outcomes to include infusion reactions, hospitalizations, and deaths occurring within 29 days of BAM administration. Moderate COVID-19 was defined as having any infiltrate on chest imaging prior to BAM administration. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical values as appropriate, and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Results. Of the 101 patients who received BAM (median age 64 years;21% black;4% Hispanic;55% male), 13 were subsequently admitted. 22 patients (22%) had moderately severe disease as evidenced by abnormal imaging. Severity on presentation, number of indications for therapy, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, and number of co-morbidities were significantly associated with subsequent admission (table 1). No patients had adverse infusion reactions. Of those hospitalized, 8 (61.5%) were for COVID-19, the median duration of hospitalization was 2 days, and 4 received guideline-directed treatment for COVID-19 (table 2). Conclusion. In a high-risk population, hospitalization rates were higher than those observed in clinical trials, with 8% of subjects being admitted for COVID-19. Disease severity on presentation, multiple indications for therapy, and the presence of multiple co-morbidities were all associated with subsequent admission. Reassuringly, BAM was well tolerated, and in those requiring admission, hospitalizations were short, resource utilization was low, and there were no deaths.